I heard a vice-president of IBM tell an audience of people assembled to redesign the process of teacher certification that in his opinion this country became computer-literate by self-teaching, not through any action of schools. He said 45 million people were comfortable with computers who had learned through dozens of non-systematic strategies, none of them very formal; if schools had pre-empted the right to teach computer use we would be in a horrible mess right now instead of leading the world in this literacy.
Probably most people working in IT learned most of what they know on their own. Is it possible that creating fixed lessons could damage this enthusiasm? I remember I was a huge technology geek, but found the Computer Studies standard grade so dull, I didn’t go on to do the Higher. It was only later I returned to University to Study Computing and got very bored in the first year where compulsory classes explained what a mouse was. The rest of the article is also very interesting, do we have the PhD because of a lost war?
The Public School Nightmare:
Why fix a system designed to destroy individual thought?
by John Taylor Gatto Read the rest of this entry »